MIT OpenCourseWare


» 進階搜尋
 課程首頁
 教學大綱
 教學時程
 相關閱讀資料
 作業
 相關資源
 下載課程

相關資源


本頁翻譯進度

燈號說明

審定:無
翻譯:劉艷(簡介並寄信)
編輯:侯嘉玨(簡介並寄信)

綜合網站
General Websites

美國最高法院網站
US Supreme Court Website
官方網站。對查找當前案例很有幫助。
Official site. Good for tracking current cases.

最高法院歷史
最高法院歷史Supreme Court History
連接到最高法院社會網站,包含了每位法官的傳記以及其他歷史材料。
Link to the site of the Supreme Court Historical Society, which has biographies of every Justice, as well as other historical materials.

尋找法律
Findlaw
很容易搜索到法院判決的全文,大部分從二十世紀開始。也可以透過註冊,在最高法院作出判決後隨時獲得電子郵件的通知。
Easily searchable full text of Court decisions, mostly from the twentieth century. You can also sign up for email alerts to be notified whenever the Supreme Court hands down a decision.

肅靜專題
Oyez Project
連接到西北大學維護的一個美國最高法院的優秀網站。
Link to an excellent website on the US Supreme Court maintained by Northwestern University.

著名審判網站
Famous Trials Site
包含了歷史上(不僅包括美國)許多著名審判的優秀網站。
An excellent site on dozens of famous trials throughout history (not only in the US).

高爾夫權利法案
Bill of Rights Golf
僅為法律上不可救藥的怪人而設。
For hopeless legal geeks only.

憲法逸事
Constitutional Trivia
比高爾夫權利法案更瘋狂。
Even geekier than Bill of Rights Golf.

肅靜棒球
Oyez Baseball
是的,有些人也有很認真的業餘時間。你必須同時熱愛棒球和最高法院才能從這個網站斬獲許多。
Yeah, some folks with some serious free time on their hands. You have to love both baseball and the Supreme Court to get much out of this one.

第6課
Class 6

Johnson訴M'Intosh案的全部
Johnson v. M'Intosh complete
如果你對閱讀全文感興趣的話,連接到Johnson訴M'Intosh案的全部文本。
A link to the complete text of Johnson v. M'Intosh, in case you're interested in reading all of it.

第9課
Class 9

Plessy訴Ferguson案(1896)
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)
連接到關於Plessy案後關於教育上<隔離但是平等>案例的網站。
Link to website that connects Plessy to later cases about "separate but equal" in education.


第10課
Class 10

Bradwell訴伊芳利諾斯州案(1872)
Bradwell v. State of Illinois (1872)
稍有刪節。完整的文本在83 U.S. 130 (1872)。
Slightly abridged. Full text is at 83 U.S. 130 (1872).

Bradwell訴伊芳利諾斯州案(1872)
Bradwell v. State of Illinois (1872)
連接到判決的完整文本。
Link to full text of decision.

美國訴Schwimmer案(1929)
United States v. Schwimmer (1929)
連接到完整的文本-完整閱讀。
Link to full text - read this in its entirety.

Ozawa訴美國案(1922)
Ozawa v. U.S. (1922)
連接到完整的文本-不需要閱讀,但值得看看。
Link to full text - not required reading, but worth looking at.

第12課
Class 12

國家勞資委員會訴Jones和Laughlin鋼鐵公司案(1937)
NLRB v. Jones and Laughlin Steel Co. (1937)
連接到301 U.S. 1 (1937)上的完整文本。不要求閱讀,但或許你會想看看。
Link to full text at 301 U.S. 1 (1937). You are not required to read this, but you might want to.

第15課
Class 15

Chaplinsky訴新罕布希爾州案(1942)
Chaplinsky v. State of New Hampshire (1942)
連接到315 U.S. 568 (1942)上的完整文本。
Link to full text at 315 U.S. 568 (1942).

美國國家社會黨訴Skokie案(1977)
National Socialist Party v. Skokie (1977)
第一最高法院在Skokie 遊行上的裁決。
First Supreme Court ruling on the Skokie march.

美國國家社會黨訴Skokie鎮案(1977)
National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie (1977)
最高法院最終判決的完整文本-不是那麼有趣。
Full text of the final Supreme Court decision -- not that interesting.

Terminiello訴芝加哥城案(1949)
Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949)
完全是選擇性的閱讀-是關於激進演講者權利的早期案例。
Totally optional reading -- this is an early case about the rights of radical speakers.

德克薩斯州訴Johnson案(1989)
Texas v. Johnson (1989)
選擇性閱讀-是關於自由演講和燒旗的一個案例。
Optional reading -- this is a case about free speech and flag burning.

第17課
Class 17

威斯康辛州訴Yoder案(1972)
Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)
選擇性閱讀︰連接到威斯康辛州訴Yoder案, 406 U.S. 205 (1972)的完整文本。
Optional Reading: This is a link to the full text of Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972).

Kiryas Joel教育部訴Grumet案(1994)
Board of Ed. of Kiryas Joel v. Grumet (1994)
選擇性閱讀︰連接到Kiryas Joel鎮學區教育部訴Grumet案, 512 U.S. 687 (1994) 的完整文本。在這個案例中法院認為,是否建立學區以服務有特殊需求的非猶太人學生,是違背了第一修正案。
Optional Reading: This is a link to the full text of Board of Ed. of Kiryas Joel Village School District v. Grumet, 512 U.S. 687 (1994), in which the Court considered whether setting up a school district to serve the needs of students with special needs who were almost exclusively Jewish was a violation of the First Amendment.

Zelman訴Simmons-Harris案(2002)
Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002)
必要閱讀︰在這裡你將發現到一個包含了引證、辯論陳述書和法院規則的背景閱讀材料網站的連接。
Required Reading: Here you'll find a link to a site that includes background readings on the vouchers debate, the briefs, and the Court's ruling.

第20課
Class 20

布朗訴教育部案(1954)
Brown v. Board of Education (1954)
連接到布朗訴托皮卡教育部案,347 U.S. 483 (1954)的完整文本。
Link to full text of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).

第21課
Class 21

Cruzan訴MDH案(1990)
Cruzan v. MDH (1990)
連接到Cruzan訴密蘇里州衛生部主管案,497 U.S. 261 (1990)的完整文本。這是最高法院對死亡權的唯一陳述。
Link to the full text of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, 497 U.S. 261 (1990). This is the Supreme Court's only statement on the right to die.

Cruzan訴MDH (1990)案: 刪節版
Cruzan v. MDH (1990): Abridged
Cruzan案例的刪節版。
An abridged version of the Cruzan case.

第22課
Class 22

密西根州案例︰口頭辯論-文本
The Michigan Cases: Oral Arguments - Text
連接到兩個案例口頭辯論的完整文本。
Here is a link to the full-text transcripts of the oral arguments in the two cases.

密西根州案例︰口頭辯論-聲音
The Michigan Cases: Oral Arguments - Sound
在這個網頁,可以找到口頭辯論語音文件的連接。持續約兩個小時。
On this page, you'll find a link to the audio file of the oral arguments. They last about two hours.

密西根州案例︰陳述書
The Michigan Cases: Briefs
連接到密西根州案例中其他利益方陳述的回顧。看看單方或各方的觀點-尤其注意麻省理工學院的陳述書。
Here's a link to the slew of amicus briefs in the Michigan cases. Take a look at one or two from each side -- and take a special look at the MIT brief.

密西根州案例︰密西根
The Michigan Cases: Michigan
連接到密西根大學維護的網站。
Link to the website maintained by the University of Michigan.

密西根州案例︰個體權利中心
The Michigan Cases: Center for Individual Rights
連接到個體權利中心的網站。
Link to the website of the Center for Individual Rights.

第24課
Class 24

美國訴維吉尼亞案(1996)
United States v. Virginia (1996)
連接到VMI判決美國訴Virginia案, 518 U.S. 515 (1996)的完整文本。
Link to full text of the VMI decision in United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515 (1996).

第九條:評論
Title IX: Overview
連接。閱讀<第九條評論>和<第九條的歷史>以及其他你想閱讀的。
Weblink. Read the "Overview of Title IX" and "History of Title IX" and whatever else you want.

第九條:<對所有人開放>
Title IX: "Open to All"
連接到教育委員會會長關於體育界機會的完整文本。它很長,在編年史中有很好的概述,所以不是必須閱讀。
Link to the full text of the Secretary of Education's Commission on Opportunity in Athletics. It's long, and well summarized in the Chronicle article, so you don't have to read this.

第九條:Jessica Gavora
Title IX: Jessica Gavora
連接到婦女運動基金會所利用第九條作為文章評論的方法。
Link to an essay critical of the approach to Title IX taken by the Women's Sports Foundation.

第九條:NCWGE的報告
Title IX: NCWGE Report
鏈接到從全國婦女教育聯盟在第九條的長篇報道的文本。完全是選擇性閱讀-相當長。
Link to the text of a long report from the National Coalition for Women and Girls in Education on Title IX. Completely optional reading -- it's quite long.


第25課
Class 25

Loving訴維吉尼亞案(1967)
Loving v. Virginia (1967)
連接到Loving訴維吉尼亞案例案, 388 U.S. 1 (1967)的完整文本。
Link to the full text of the case Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967).

Baker訴佛蒙特州案(1999)
Baker v. Vermont (1999)
連接到Baker訴佛蒙特州案例, 744 A.2d 865 (Vt. 1999)的刪節版。
Link to an abridged version of Baker v. State of Vermont, 744 A.2d 865 (Vt. 1999).

Rutland Herald社論
Rutland Herald editorials
連接到Baker訴佛蒙特州案之後Rutland Herald在佛蒙特州中部關於同性戀結婚的辯論的普利策獎得獎社論。
Link to the Pulitzer-prize-winning editorials from the Rutland Herald in the midst of Vermont's debates over gay marriage after Baker v. Vermont.

第27課
Class 27

柯林頓訴瓊斯案(1997)
Clinton v. Jones (1997)
連接到柯林頓訴瓊斯案, 520 U.S. 681 (1997)的判決。
Link to decision in Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681 (1997).

布希訴戈爾案(2000)
Bush v. Gore (2000)
連接到布希訴戈爾(2000)的完整判決。盡你所能閱讀多種不同的判決。
Link to the full decision in Bush v. Gore (2000). Read as much of all the various decisions as you can.

布希訴戈爾案(2000)
Bush v. Gore (2000)
連接到這個案例的背景材料(陳述書,低層法院規則等等)。
Link to background materials on the case (briefs, lower court rulings, etc.).

第29課
Class 29

Joseph Lelyveld, 〈在 Guantanamo〉
Joseph Lelyveld, "In Guantanamo"
連接到《紐約書評》中的一篇文章,49 no. 17 (2002年11月7日)。很長,但是很好。
Link to article from New York Review of Books 49 no. 17 (November 7, 2002). It's long, but it's good.

恐怖主義︰問題和答案
Terrorism: Questions and Answers
連接到外交關係協會維護的一個網站。在國家安全的角度下,看<平衡安全和公權利>。因應9-11事件下,閱讀<軍事法庭>、<公民法院>和<被拘留者和戰俘>。
Link to a website maintained by the Council on Foreign Relations. Under Homeland Security, look at "Balancing Security and Civil Rights." Under Responses to 9/11, look at "Military Tribunals," "Civilian Courts," and "Detainees and POWs."

美國民權聯盟盤問<禁飛名單>
ACLU Quiz on the "No-Fly List"
並不全是憲法性的東西,但也可以閱讀。
It's not quite Constitutional Baseball, but it's okay.




 
MIT Home
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Terms of Use Privacy